Rockies–Dodgers totals: 1xBet underpricing the line by 2.5% relative to sharp consensus, 28 hours before first pitch
What happened: Final score: 6–7. This one lost. A real edge is a long-run average, not a per-bet promise — we publish every outcome either way. The market agreed with the signal: the price closed +1.8% better than where the edge was flagged (positive closing-line value — the strongest sign the edge was real). For the record: the flagged price stayed live for about 2 hours after detection before the edge closed.
This story covers a single signal — right now the member board has 662 live signals across 274 matches, found the same way.
The setup — the analysis as published at detection, written 27.6 hours before start and frozen for the record. The market it describes has since closed; the outcome is above.
At detection—28 hours before Colorado Rockies vs Los Angeles Dodgers (MLB)—a totals mismatch has opened. 1xBet is quoting decimal odds of 2.11, placing its price 2.5% below the benchmark established by independent sharp operators. The mispricing is actionable as of writing; this represents an active market gap, not settled outcome analysis.
1xBet's quote deviates 7.8 standard deviations from the consensus cluster anchored by other books—a statistical separation that far exceeds ordinary market drift.
The consensus line draws from 9 independent sharp sources, grounding the benchmark in distributed professional judgment rather than a single operator's model.
This signal aligns with 1 historically profitable pattern tracked in our Playbook, with the strongest closed sample returning +20.6% ROI on settled bets.
Comparable signals in baseball totals—specifically mid-range odds—have tracked across 769 settled bets on our record, producing +4.9% cumulative ROI when similar edges have triggered.
Mispricings of this magnitude do not typically extend through first pitch. Historical observation suggests comparable edges in this market segment have generally compressed toward consensus within roughly 20 hours from detection.
Historical, aggregate data on settled bets — not betting advice and not a guarantee. Markets adapt; edges fade; variance is real.
AN EXAMPLE OF THE MEMBER VIEW
· what members see on a bet like this — shown for a different,
already-settled matchPRO
Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals
· MLB · Baseball — flagged side Under 8.5
@ 2.15
79Omen Score
This is the complete breakdown members get for every live signal.
The example below is a DIFFERENT match, already settled — its market is closed,
so full disclosure costs nothing. Everything is real except values marked
🔒, which are members-only (decoy digits shown).
Rec-book consensus only — no sharp anchor.High confidence + meaningful price gap — best risk-adjusted segment.
A sample of bookmakers on this betnear close — every price against the same no-vig fair
Bookmaker
Odds
Vs fair
Hard Rock
2.15
+0.9%
espn-bet
2.10
-1.4%
Hard Rock
2.10
-1.4%
1xBet
2.08
-2.3%
Matchbook
2.08
-2.3%
sport888
2.05
-3.8%
betparx
1.96
-7.9%
Bally Bet
1.96
-7.9%
BetRivers
1.96
-7.9%
PMU
1.83
-14.3%
Risk & profitability profile
Heavy favoriteFavoriteCoin flipUnderdogLongshot
2.15 odds → 47% implied win probability
47%
Fair win probability
+4.9% 🔒
Expected ROI (model)
+8.0% 🔒
Cohort realized ROI
The endingthe part only a settled signal can show
Detected Aug 17, 18:51 UTC at 2.25 (+4.4% edge) → fair price at close 2.13 → closing-line value +1.1%
✅ Settled: WON · +1.25 units
A real, settled example — not a typical-results claim
(read this signal's full story).
The live breakdown for Colorado Rockies vs Los Angeles Dodgers
is on the member board now ·
unlock with Pro
Record settled · last updated Aug 19, 2026 03:41 UTC · How these numbers are made: methodology · the dataset — fair prices shown are margin-free. Spotted an error? Request a correction (include this page's URL).